Semantic Layer Version Control: Managing Metric Definitions as Code

Learn how to apply software engineering version control practices to semantic layer definitions, enabling collaboration, audit trails, and safe deployment of metric changes.

6 min read·

Semantic layer version control is the practice of managing metric definitions, dimension hierarchies, and semantic model configurations using the same version control systems and practices that software engineering teams use for application code. By treating semantic layer definitions as code, organizations gain collaboration capabilities, audit trails, rollback ability, and disciplined change management for their critical business metrics.

When a CFO asks why revenue numbers changed between yesterday and today, version control provides the answer. When a metric definition needs to evolve, version control enables safe, reviewable changes. This discipline transforms semantic layers from fragile configurations into robust, engineering-grade systems.

Why Version Control for Semantic Layers

The Change Management Challenge

Semantic layer changes can have significant business impact:

  • A revenue calculation change affects executive dashboards
  • A dimension hierarchy update changes how users filter data
  • A join modification alters metric accuracy

Without version control, these changes happen without visibility, review, or recourse.

Benefits of Version Control

Audit trail: Every change is recorded with who, when, and why.

Collaboration: Multiple team members can work on changes simultaneously.

Review process: Changes can be examined before deployment.

Rollback capability: If something breaks, revert to the previous version.

Environment promotion: Move changes through dev, staging, production safely.

Semantic Layer as Code

Definition File Structure

Organize semantic layer definitions in version-controllable files:

semantic-layer/
  metrics/
    finance/
      revenue.yaml
      costs.yaml
      profitability.yaml
    sales/
      pipeline.yaml
      performance.yaml
  dimensions/
    time.yaml
    geography.yaml
    customer.yaml
  relationships/
    customer_orders.yaml
    product_hierarchy.yaml
  access/
    roles.yaml
    policies.yaml

Definition Format

Use declarative, version-friendly formats:

# metrics/finance/revenue.yaml
metric:
  name: revenue
  version: 2.1.0

  definition:
    calculation: SUM(amount)
    source: orders
    filters:
      - status = 'complete'
      - type != 'refund'

  dimensions:
    - region
    - product_category
    - customer_segment
    - time

  metadata:
    owner: finance-team
    certification: certified
    description: |
      Total recognized revenue from completed orders,
      excluding refunds and credits.

  changelog:
    - version: 2.1.0
      date: 2024-02-15
      change: Added customer_segment dimension
      author: jsmith
    - version: 2.0.0
      date: 2024-01-10
      change: Changed to exclude credits (breaking change)
      author: mjones

Why YAML or Similar Formats

Text-based formats enable version control features:

  • Diff visibility: See exactly what changed between versions
  • Merge capability: Combine changes from multiple contributors
  • Search: Find all metrics referencing a specific table
  • Automation: Parse and validate programmatically

Git Workflows for Semantic Layers

Branch Strategy

Main branch: Always reflects production semantic layer state.

Feature branches: Short-lived branches for specific changes.

main
  └── feature/add-customer-segment-dimension
  └── feature/update-revenue-filter
  └── fix/cost-calculation-bug

Environment branches (optional):

main (production)
  └── staging
      └── development

Pull Request Process

Every change goes through review:

1. Create feature branch
2. Make changes to definition files
3. Run automated validation
4. Open pull request
5. Business owner reviews semantic correctness
6. Technical owner reviews implementation
7. Automated tests pass
8. Merge to main
9. Deploy to production

Commit Messages

Write meaningful commit messages:

feat(revenue): add customer_segment dimension

- Added customer_segment as valid dimension for revenue metric
- Updated documentation with segmentation guidance
- Verified backward compatibility with existing queries

Requested-by: finance-team
Reviewed-by: data-platform

Automated Validation

Pre-Commit Checks

Validate before allowing commits:

# .pre-commit-config.yaml
repos:
  - repo: local
    hooks:
      - id: yaml-lint
        name: Lint YAML files
        entry: yamllint
        files: \.yaml$

      - id: semantic-validate
        name: Validate semantic definitions
        entry: semantic-layer validate
        files: ^semantic-layer/

CI/CD Pipeline Validation

Run comprehensive checks on pull requests:

# .github/workflows/semantic-layer-ci.yaml
name: Semantic Layer CI

on: [pull_request]

jobs:
  validate:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2

      - name: Validate syntax
        run: semantic-layer validate --syntax

      - name: Check metric tests
        run: semantic-layer test --metrics

      - name: Verify relationships
        run: semantic-layer validate --relationships

      - name: Check for breaking changes
        run: semantic-layer diff --breaking-only

Test Types

Syntax validation: Ensure definition files are well-formed.

Metric calculation tests: Verify metrics return expected results for test data.

Relationship validation: Confirm joins and references are valid.

Performance tests: Check that metrics meet query time expectations.

Breaking change detection: Identify changes that affect existing consumers.

Deployment Strategies

Environment Promotion

Move changes through environments:

Development → Staging → Production

Development:
  - Immediate deployment on merge to dev branch
  - Sample data, frequent changes

Staging:
  - Deployment on merge to staging branch
  - Production-like data (anonymized)
  - Integration testing with BI tools

Production:
  - Deployment on merge to main branch
  - Approval gates required
  - Rollback procedures ready

Blue-Green Deployment

Run two versions simultaneously:

1. Current production (blue) serves all traffic
2. Deploy new version (green) alongside
3. Validate green with test queries
4. Switch traffic to green
5. Keep blue available for quick rollback

Canary Releases

Gradual rollout of changes:

1. Deploy new version
2. Route 5% of queries to new version
3. Monitor for errors or anomalies
4. Gradually increase percentage
5. Full rollout when confident

Handling Breaking Changes

What Constitutes Breaking

Breaking changes:

  • Removing a metric
  • Changing a metric calculation significantly
  • Removing a valid dimension
  • Changing filter behavior

Non-breaking changes:

  • Adding a new metric
  • Adding a dimension to a metric
  • Improving documentation
  • Performance optimization without result changes

Breaking Change Process

1. Announce deprecation with timeline
2. Document migration path
3. Add deprecation warnings in API responses
4. Support both old and new versions temporarily
5. Remove old version after transition period

Versioned Metrics

For significant changes, version the metric:

# Old version - deprecated
metric:
  name: revenue_v1
  deprecated: true
  deprecation_date: 2024-06-01
  migration_to: revenue_v2

# New version
metric:
  name: revenue_v2
  # New calculation...

Collaboration Practices

Ownership Model

Define clear ownership:

# CODEOWNERS
/semantic-layer/metrics/finance/    @finance-data-team
/semantic-layer/metrics/sales/      @sales-analytics
/semantic-layer/metrics/product/    @product-analytics
/semantic-layer/dimensions/         @data-platform
/semantic-layer/access/             @security-team

Review Requirements

Enforce appropriate reviews:

# Branch protection rules
main:
  required_reviews: 2
  required_reviewers:
    - business-owner
    - technical-owner
  required_status_checks:
    - semantic-layer-ci
    - breaking-change-review

Communication

Keep stakeholders informed:

  • Announce upcoming changes in team channels
  • Publish changelog for each release
  • Notify affected dashboard owners
  • Document changes in metric descriptions

Best Practices

Keep Definitions DRY

Use inheritance and references:

# _templates/standard_metric.yaml
template:
  metadata:
    owner: data-team
    certification: draft

# metrics/revenue.yaml
metric:
  extends: _templates/standard_metric
  name: revenue
  # Override or extend as needed

Document Intent

Include context in definitions:

metric:
  name: revenue
  documentation:
    purpose: Primary top-line financial metric
    usage_guidance: Use for all external reporting
    known_limitations: Excludes pending transactions
    related_metrics: [bookings, arr, recognized_revenue]

Automate Everything

  • Automated syntax validation
  • Automated testing
  • Automated deployment
  • Automated documentation generation
  • Automated change notifications

Version control transforms semantic layer management from a fragile, manual process into a robust, collaborative discipline. Teams can confidently evolve metric definitions knowing that every change is tracked, reviewed, and reversible.

Questions

It depends on your organization. Separate repos provide clearer ownership and different review processes. Combined repos ensure sync between application and metric changes. Many organizations use a dedicated analytics repo that includes semantic layer definitions alongside dbt models.

Related